Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7510 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon HD 7510 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 7510 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7510 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (39W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 21.34GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7510 OEM
0.416 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +50%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Feb 2012
Southern Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
667 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
21.34GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
480
16
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
10.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
416.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

39W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Turks
Turks LE
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy