Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7640G IGP vs AMD FirePro A300

AMD Radeon HD 7640G IGP vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 7640G IGP and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7640G IGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (905MHz vs 655MHz)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7640G IGP
0.335 TFLOPS
FirePro A300 +107%
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
Trinity
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

496 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
655 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
6
256
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

5.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
10.48 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
335.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator Lite
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
32 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy