Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2007
Southern Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
103.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.315 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
828.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV516
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy