Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1650MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (85W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Boost
3.315 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +27%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2020
Southern Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
103.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
3.315 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
828.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
85W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 14
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy