Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs Intel Arc A350

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
1.229 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +149%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
Southern Islands
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy