CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
VS
AMD Radeon HD 7950
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950
2.867 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
+669%
22.06 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950
VS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
Graphics Card
Jan 2012
Release Date
Apr 2024
Southern Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
34
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
4352
112
TMUs
136
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
AD104
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
AD104-150-K1-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
200W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs ATI FirePro V7770
2
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
3
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
4
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
5
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
6
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
7
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 X2
8
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
9
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
10
AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy