Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 8350 OEM and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 20W)
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Jan 2008
Sea Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
667 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
80
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
RV380
-
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy