AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2100MHz vs 1700MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 1638GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
22.63 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+622%
163.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Dec 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
192GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM3
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
19456
416
TMUs
880
0
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
750W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
MI300
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
146 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A
