AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 570 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
+77934%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 570
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
6656
Shading Units
16
416
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.680 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.44 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
38W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
G84
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
Unknown
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
