Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +3538%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
6656
Shading Units
240
416
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
189W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GT200B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy