Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
More VRAM (128GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1638GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
22.63 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +111%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
14080
416
TMUs
880
0
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
Aldebaran
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy