AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
+475%
22.63 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X
3.935 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Nov 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
2688
416
TMUs
224
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
235W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK110
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
