Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA GRID K200

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI25 +436%
12.29 TFLOPS
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
852 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
436.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GK104
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy