Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and a GPU: 40GB VRAM A100 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1700MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 40GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1555GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +145%
47.87 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
765 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
40GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
1555GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
108
14080
Shading Units
6912
880
TMUs
432
0
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
40 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA100
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy