Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs AMD Instinct MI300A

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2100MHz vs 1700MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 3277GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
47.87 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +156%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Dec 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM3
8192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
228
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
14592
880
TMUs
880
0
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
760W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
MI300
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
146 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy