Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs H200 SXM

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs H200 SXM

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and a GPU: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 700W)
H200 SXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1980MHz vs 1700MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4800GB/s vs 3277GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
47.87 TFLOPS
H200 SXM +39%
67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Hopper
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1590 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
141GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM3e
8192bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
4800GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
16896
880
TMUs
528
0
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1979 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
67 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GH200
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
4 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
80 billion
Unknown
Die Size
814 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
700W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy