Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +9749%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2010
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
14080
Shading Units
256
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
142W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF100
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy