Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
14064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +164968%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Oct 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
14080
Shading Units
16
880
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
21W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G86
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy