Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
13952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +13499%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
14080
Shading Units
128
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G92
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy