Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
14048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +66386%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2009
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
14080
Shading Units
32
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G96C
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
Unknown
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy