Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
13504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +6133%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
576
880
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK106
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy