Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (1700MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
11200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +848%
47.87 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
2880
880
TMUs
240
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
245W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK110B
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy