Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
13632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +4547%
47.87 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
14080
Shading Units
448
880
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF100
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy