Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 172% (2100MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +2200%
81.72 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
2304
1216
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
48
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
150W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy