Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
19008 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (750W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +7849%
81.72 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
448
1216
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
48
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
900W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy