Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
18016 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +3953%
81.72 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
1440
1216
TMUs
72
0
ROPs
32
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
150W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy