Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
19360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +33950%
81.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Apr 2009
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
19456
Shading Units
96
1216
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
12
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

750W
TDP
75W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy