Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (2100MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
18688 additional rendering cores
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +3332%
81.72 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Nov 2020
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
768
1216
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
24
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
300W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
153 billion
Transistors
Unknown
1017 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy