AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock3230MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (322.3GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI50
+1886%
26.46 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2025
Release Date
Jul 2011
Navi IV
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2220 MHz
Base Clock
-
3230 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2518 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
322.3GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
206.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
413.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
52.92 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.46 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
826.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Navi 44
GPU Name
GF110
Navi 44 XT
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
