Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs AMD FirePro M2000

AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock907MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 460 +287%
1.858 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
907 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Turks
Baffin XT
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy