Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1200MHz vs 907MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 460
1.858 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +32%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Apr 2020
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
TU117
Baffin XT
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy