Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs ATI Radeon E2400

AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock907MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 460 +3770%
1.858 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
907 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
2
1024
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
RV610
Baffin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy