Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +576%
4.224 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
Turks GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy