Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 625 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 13.20GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +2414%
4.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 625 OEM
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Feb 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
825 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
13.20GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.748 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.992 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
167.8 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GF119
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy