Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +24%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Jul 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy