Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +785%
4.224 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy