Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +28%
4.224 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Sep 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy