Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1757MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5500 XT +569%
5.398 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1187 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1757 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

56.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
168.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
10.80 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.398 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
337.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy