Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 560 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 560 +383%
1.858 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
4
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
RV730
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy