Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1590MHz vs 1350MHz)
Lower TDP (80W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5700 +118%
6.221 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Jul 2020
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1243 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
194.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
12.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
6.221 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
388.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 10 XLA
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy