Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1499MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (130W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
7.675 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +4%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1243 MHz
Base Clock
-
1499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

95.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
239.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
15.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.675 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
479.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 10 XTA
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy