Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 575 +3980%
4.489 TFLOPS
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
217.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

35.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.148 GPixel/s
140.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.592 GTexel/s
4.489 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.489 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
110.1 GFLOPS
280.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.176 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
GF119
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
GPU Variant
N12M-GS
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
12W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy