CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+1276%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
128
144
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
G92
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
135W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 560DX
3
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
4
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
5
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
6
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
7
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy