AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

1024 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock1725MHz

Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +29%

5.728 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

4.416 TFLOPS

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Graphics Card

Apr 2017

Release Date

Nov 2019

Radeon Pro GCN

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1530 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1725 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

224.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

20

36

Compute Units

-

2304

Shading Units

1280

144

TMUs

80

32

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.20 GPixel/s

179.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

138.0 GTexel/s

5.728 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

8.832 TFLOPS

5.728 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

4.416 TFLOPS

358.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere

GPU Name

TU116

Ellesmere Gemini GL

GPU Variant

TU116-250-KA-A1

GCN 4.0

Architecture

Turing

GlobalFoundries

Foundry

TSMC

14 nm

Process Size

12 nm

5.7 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

232 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Board Design

250W

TDP

100W

600 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.1

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.7

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

2

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

3

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 560DX

4

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

5

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

6

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

7

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 5490

8

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FireStream 9370

9

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GA102

10

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip