CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+575%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 OEM
0.848 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
GeForce GTX 560 OEM
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.25 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.50 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
847.9 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
106.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GF110
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GF110-040-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
3
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 560DX
4
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
5
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
6
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
7
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 5490
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy