AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+7%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2880
144
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GK180
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
