Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Intel Arc A310

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +113%
5.728 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Oct 2022
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
DG2-128
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy