AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+329%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
8192
144
TMUs
512
32
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
