CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA PG506 242
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA PG506 242
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
NVIDIA PG506 242
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
PG506 242
+80%
10.32 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
PG506 242
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
3584
144
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GA100
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
3
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 560DX
4
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
5
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
6
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
7
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 5490
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 DDR4
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 570 X2
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy