Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1785MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +113%
10.75 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Feb 2021
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
192bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
22
56
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
1408
224
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
TU116
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
125W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy